First Annual Flagship Symposium

Isle of Palms, SC March 10-12, 2023

Thank you for taking the time to complete the program evaluation for the Flagship Symposium. This will only take a few minutes, and your feedback is extremely important to our organizing committee and team. We rely heavily on these evaluations as we plan future events and are very grateful for the time you take helping us ensure that we are providing the best possible education to our community.

Detailed instructions on how to obtain your CME certificate (through PeerPoint) will be sent to you via email.

Full Name and degree(s) exactly as you would like it to appear on the CE certificate (Example: Jane Doe, DDS, MD)(Required)

Email Address(Required)

What did you like most about this program?

What did you like least about this program?

What suggestions for improvement do you have for future Flagship Specialty Partners programs?

What topics or speakers would you like Flagship Specialty Partners to consider for future meetings? (please keep in mind that all of our programs must be relevant to hard and soft tissue regeneration)

How would you rate this program compared to other programs you have attended

Overall, did the program meet your expectations?

Definitely not	Not really/neutral	Definitely

Did you learn new techniques that you can integrate into your clinical practice?

Yes

As a result of attending this program, my opinion of Flagship Specialty Partners has:

Dr. Myron Tucker

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Dr. Brian Farrell

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Dr. John Nale

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Dr. Joe Niamtu

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Dr. Adrian Lineberger

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Dr. Mary Charles Haigler

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Drs. Eric Burgon and Samer Joudeh

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Dr. Matthew Pham

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Dr. Steve Press

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Drs. Rick Kapitan and Hunter Dawson

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Dr. Kanyon Keeney

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Dr. Teresa Biggerstaff

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Knowledge of topic
Content was informative and relevant
Content was accurate and current
Content was presented at an appropriate level
Presentation skills
Clarity of presentation
Provided sufficient detail
Responsive to participant comments and questions

Please rate the following

	Poor	Fair	Good	Very Good	Excellent
Registration process
Length of Conference
Content was informative and relevant.
Content was accurate and current
Quality of Audio Visual
Value of exhibitors
Hotel Accommodations
Catering

Do you have any other comments you would like to share about this meeting?

Do you require CME credits?

Yes

Please indicate how many CE hours you earned: Full program: 9.25 hours = 9.25 CE Credits(Required)

Nationally Approved PACE Program Provider for FAGD/MAGD ID No. 355420
Approval does not imply acceptance by any regulatory authority, or AGD endorsement. 7/1/18 to 6/30/24*

Name

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Terms of Use